cost to replacing cedar shake roof with asphalt shingles

The Cost of Replacing a Cedar Shake Roof with Asphalt Shingles

When it comes to roofing options, cedar shake and asphalt shingles are two popular choices among homeowners. Cedar shake roofs are known for their natural beauty and durability, while asphalt shingles offer cost-effectiveness and ease of installation. However, as time passes, many homeowners find themselves facing the decision to replace their cedar shake roofs due to wear and tear, weather damage, or personal preference. This article explores the costs associated with replacing a cedar shake roof with asphalt shingles, highlighting factors such as materials, labor, and potential long-term savings.

Understanding Cedar Shake Roofs

Cedar shake roofs have been a traditional choice for many homes due to their aesthetic appeal and longevity. Made from split cedar wood, these roofs can last anywhere from 20 to 40 years, depending on maintenance and environmental factors. However, they can be susceptible to damage from insects, moisture, and rot, leading to higher maintenance costs over time. When the condition of a cedar shake roof becomes compromised, homeowners often consider replacement to ensure the integrity of their home.

1. Material Costs The first factor to consider in the replacement process is the cost of materials. Asphalt shingles are significantly less expensive than cedar shakes. The average cost of asphalt shingles ranges from $90 to $100 per square (100 square feet), while cedar shakes can cost between $300 and $500 per square. Therefore, the material cost savings when switching to asphalt shingles can be substantial—potentially saving homeowners thousands of dollars.

2. Labor Costs Labor costs for roofing installation can vary based on the contractor's experience, location, and complexity of the roof. On average, labor costs for installing asphalt shingles might range from $50 to $75 per square. In comparison, the installation process for cedar shakes can be more labor-intensive and may cost between $100 and $150 per square due to the need for specialized skills. When replacing a cedar shake roof with asphalt shingles, homeowners can benefit from lower labor costs as well.

3. Additional Expenses Homeowners should also consider any additional expenses that may arise during the replacement process. If the existing cedar shake roof is damaged, it may need to be removed entirely, which adds to disposal fees and labor costs. Furthermore, there might be costs associated with underlayment, flashing, and vent installation. While asphalt shingles require a sound substrate for installation, they are generally less complicated to install than cedar shakes, resulting in potential savings on labor.

4. Long-term Savings Although the initial cost of replacing a cedar shake roof with asphalt shingles is a significant consideration, homeowners should also factor in long-term savings. Asphalt shingles are generally more durable and require less maintenance than cedar shake roofs. Cedar shakes need regular inspections, cleaning, and maintenance to prevent deterioration, whereas asphalt shingles can often last 20-30 years with proper installation and care. This reduction in maintenance can lead to lower overall expenses in the long run.

Conclusion

In summary, homeowners contemplating the replacement of their cedar shake roofs with asphalt shingles can benefit from a range of cost savings. The lower material and labor costs associated with asphalt shingles make this option financially attractive. Additionally, the potential for reduced maintenance expenses further enhances the appeal of asphalt shingles as an alternative to cedar shakes. Ultimately, when considering roof replacement options, it is advisable for homeowners to conduct thorough research, obtain multiple quotes from contractors, and carefully evaluate their long-term financial goals before making a decision. Making an informed choice can lead to a beautiful and durable roof that enhances the value of a home while being friendly to the wallet.